Apple cracking down on unlocked iPhone sales - limits iPhone purchases to 2 per credit card, no cash

Posted by Will on Saturday, October 27th, 2007 at 3:17 pm under iPhone
No Tags

iPhone cash buyers are out of luck - credit or debit card only for 2 iPhones per personLast time we checked we were still in America. But, apparently, once you step inside an Apple Store, you’re on Steve Jobs’ turf - and subject to his rules. In an effort to curb the seemingly rampant sales of unlocked iPhones through, say, eBay, Stevie has limited iPhone sales to 2 per person!

Just how does Apple intend to enforce this ruling? Well, in his infinite wisdom, Stevie has decreed that iPhones will henceforth only be sold to plastic customers - if you want an iPhone, you’d better warm up your credit or debit card, no cash will be accepted. Don’t have any plastic? You might be SOL.

You see, Apple has estimated that fully 250,000 of the 1.4 million iPhones sold thus far were summarily unlocked and sold for use outside of AT&T’s network. And, with Apple speculated to be making a couple hundred dollars per iPhone per year from their revenue sharing deal with AT&T, 250,000 unlocked iPhones represents millions in lost revenue. Apple only gets the kickback from iPhones using AT&T’s network - unlocked iPhones on other networks are outside the scope of that deal and essentially take money put of Apple’s healthy coffers.

So, if you’re planning on buying all your friends and loved ones an iPhone this holiday shopping season, you’d better distribute your iPhone allotment across multiple cards. Pre-paid debit cards anyone?

[Via: NYT]

Related News:

  • Apple increases iPhone purchase limit to 5 per person
  • AT&T back-peddles on iPhone sales limit - allows three iPhones per person
  • AT&T limiting iPhone sales to one per person, credit card required
  • iPhone 3G goes on sale 8AM, July 11 - will require credit card and social security credentials
  • iPhone hardware unlocking teenager could be in legal hot water - George Hotz may be vulnerable to litigation
  • Leave a Reply